Re: More dev86 changes (0.16.7)

[mjn3@codepoet.org (Manuel Novoa III)]

Robert,

On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 09:28:14PM +0100, Robert de Bath wrote:
> 
> Okay, "UL" is now added as a valid type specifier for integers.
> However specifing the type will make no difference as the integer
> type for preprocessor expressions is supposed to be the largest
> available integer however you express it.
> 
> I'm not even sure specifing a type is actually legal, but I think it's
> covered by the phrase "identifier-nondigit" in the syntax table.

ANSI/ISO C99 seems to allow an integer suffix on integer constants
in the constant expressions following an #if.  At least, I don't
see anything indicating otherwise.

> > Also, with the old cpp one could use "-I" to not include the default
> > include dirs.  This feature seems to be lacking in the new version.
> 
> That is a bug in the new bcc.c that's been there since it first appeared,
> (Errm, 0.16.2) ho hum nobody noticed before. (Including me!!!)
> 
> Okay fixed, and I'll be uploading a new version tomorrow with those
> and a few other changes.

Great.  I should have time tomorrow to download it and run some more
tests.

Manuel