From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gavin Subject: Re: 286 xterm? Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 21:23:09 +1200 Sender: linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200209032123.09997.redhat@ihug.co.nz> References: <20020831232414.V96017-100000@agora.rdrop.com> <200209031129.02009.redhat@ihug.co.nz> <3D74EA83.7A96@havn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <3D74EA83.7A96@havn.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Linux-8086 - ELKS Actually this brings us back to a gui for ELKS Since even the desqview option is 386 onwards, and for this I would use a cut down linux, if there's enough memory in the graphics card even a 386 is pretty acceptable x-term. I wonder now as to the nano-x option. So for me, this has gone full circle, and back to seeing what it would take to get a gui onto an AT class machine. Thanks to all who contributed. Now can we get a solution ????? On Wednesday 04 September 2002 4:59 am, Blaz Antonic wrote: > This is getting slightly off-topic but anyway ... > > > > As I have a ibmps1 here that wont boot into elks, an x-term alternative > > would be worth looking into. ( I am presenting a demo on x-terms at the > > local lug soon and a few "unique demos will be good" an elks telnet via > > slip will be running too :-) > > PS1 = AT class machine. As people pointed out Desqview/X won't (well, > shouldn't according to docs) run on sub-386 processors. Older version > Gregg was referring to (namely Desqview) don't have X capabilities.