From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eduardo Pereira Habkost <ehabkost@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: gcc-8086 patch (very experimental)
Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 18:15:47 -0300
Sender: linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20040513211547.GW13835@duckman.distro.conectiva>
References: <20040513150634.GP13835@duckman.distro.conectiva> <1084464170.3219.6.camel@talena.hsol.net> <20040513164406.GT13835@duckman.distro.conectiva>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v6gilOcl2gU05R9Q"
Return-path: <linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040513164406.GT13835@duckman.distro.conectiva>
List-Id: <linux-8086.vger.kernel.org>
To: linux-8086@vger.kernel.org


--v6gilOcl2gU05R9Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 01:44:06PM -0300, Eduardo Pereira Habkost wrote:
<snip>
>=20
> Just sharing my thoughts. I think that I should show something more
> concrete, now, and not only wondering "how nice would it be if we have
> foobar ported to 8086".

As I said, something more concrete:
http://raisama.net/gcc-8086

Have fun.  :)

--
Eduardo

--v6gilOcl2gU05R9Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAo+WDcaRJ66w1lWgRAk+tAJ9Casp+jhhmGpdv4LyoBtG/BcofywCeLc37
nkDbqSH2NwLGvqnyeYYf23k=
=jeiE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--v6gilOcl2gU05R9Q--