From: Tommy McCabe <rocketjet314@yahoo.com>
To: linux-8086@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Results-Oriented Work
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 15:30:59 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040526223059.6947.qmail@web51310.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c001c4432a$7112c740$0101a8c0@vash>
--- Jody <jbruchon@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> I am seeing a lot of ideas relating to swapping and
> protected mode support
> and far pointers and far pointer relocation and
> whatnot.
>
> This is interesting discussion but I think we will
> make more headway if we
> take a results-oriented approach to this stuff in
> the beginning. Less
> talking about whether to implement fancy 286pmode
> stuff and more coding to
> make things work, one at a time. We have some TODO
> lists going and I think
> that we should start taking care of some of those
> things.
>
> I got a luggable 256K PC-compatible. Please code
> with the 256K machines in
> mind :) Because the 640K machines are not always
> the norm.
>
> Please code a LILO-like program for ELKS so we can
> have our friggin'
> software boot from a filesystem instead of a kernel
> floppy or something.
> That's the next thing I want to see, because all
> this kernel work is a
> little pointless to me if I can't run it off a
> filesystem of some sort.
> Many 8086 machines have hard drives, so if someone
> would take the time to
> do it, that would be awesome and lead to the
> possibility of an EDE with
> *open source* boot-loader software instead of that
> binary-only "bootkit."
>
> To review: we need working and stable code for core
> stuff. Let's try to
> shift the focus there instead of spewing out huge
> lists of features to add.
> Features are nice but quite useless if the core is
> unstable.
>
> My opinion. Please do not attack.
I agree- but I said the same thing a few days ago, and
no one noticed.
> Jody
> "w00t!"
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
> "unsubscribe linux-8086" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-26 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-26 14:05 Results-Oriented Work Jody
2004-05-26 14:13 ` Alver
2004-05-26 22:30 ` Tommy McCabe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040526223059.6947.qmail@web51310.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=rocketjet314@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-8086@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox