From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paul Nasrat <pauln@truemesh.com>
Subject: Re: Experimental fix for my memcpy_{to,from}fs problem
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 14:37:12 +0000
Sender: linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20040603143711.GA13536@lichen.truemesh.com>
References: <20040601213231.GT21172@duckman.distro.conectiva> <20040601220235.GU21172@duckman.distro.conectiva> <20040601223034.GW21172@duckman.distro.conectiva> <1086145026.3220.41.camel@talena.hsol.net> <20040602162521.GC26330@duckman.distro.conectiva> <1086271338.3227.3.camel@talena.hsol.net> <20040603141438.GG26330@duckman.distro.conectiva>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040603141438.GG26330@duckman.distro.conectiva>
List-Id: <linux-8086.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-8086@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 11:14:39AM -0300, Eduardo Pereira Habkost wrote:
> Hi, Mike,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 08:02:18AM -0600, Miguel Bolanos wrote:
> > Applied, but i did some changes on the patch, please read bellow.
 
> The changes are on CVS? I did an 'cvs update', and the last revision of
> user.c (1.17) doesn't contain any of these changes.

Does sf still lag public anoncvs one day behind?

Paul