From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "jerryc@innerpeace.org" <jerryc@innerpeace.org>
Subject: Re: New Member VERY hot on 8086's
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 23:27:00 -0500
Sender: linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <3E239194.2070605@innerpeace.org>
References: <3E21D8FC.1050305@innerpeace.org>	 <1042414135.16288.52.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>	 <3E2220A6.7050500@innerpeace.org> <1042470345.18624.17.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org>
List-Id: <linux-8086.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: linux-8086@vger.kernel.org


Jerry:
>>security as these will all be free standing machines. With those 
>>parameters, would you say ELKS would work better than Minix for this?

Alan:
> ELKS is smaller, Minix is a hell of a lot more tested.

Jerry:
I'm assuming smaller is faster running, and maybe faster loading. Since 
we're doing so little, mostly echoing text to the screen, there isn't 
much to test.