From: Jody <jbruchon@nc.rr.com>
To: ELKS <linux-8086@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Regarding the Future of ELKS
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 14:58:51 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <463CD3EB.6020506@nc.rr.com> (raw)
Hello everyone. This is Jody, the current maintainer of the ELKS
project. I wanted to ask for everyone's opinion on what the future of
ELKS should be.
I can see many compelling reasons to drop ELKS entirely or shift it away
from the 80(2)86-oriented platform, including the following:
* No one works on ELKS. Really. I'm no C programmer, and apparently
all the ones that COULD work on it have moved on to "bigger better
things" in their lives.
* 8086/80286 cores are being dropped in favor of other platforms,
including ARM, 386EX, Coldfire, etc. While embedded Linux covers a lot
of that territory, there is certainly some room for discussion of
changing ELKS to be more portable and pushing it to those platforms.
The minimalist approach to the ELKS kernel would make it far smaller
than Linux and it could potentially compete with the likes of other
smaller operating systems used in embedded applications, such as VxWorks.
* ELKS has not developed to a very "usable" stage yet. There are a
hundred different ways the project could go, but the original stated
goals are quickly showing that they are not it. Lack of interest in the
project and limited ability to reuse the code are clear signs that
something must change.
To those of you who are still subscribed to this list: what do you think
should be done? I look forward to hearing your answers!
~Jody
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-05 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-05 18:58 Jody [this message]
2007-05-05 22:10 ` Regarding the Future of ELKS Royce Williams
2007-05-05 22:14 ` NOTICE REGARDING SENDING MAIL TO THE ELKS LIST Jody
2007-05-06 10:08 ` Regarding the Future of ELKS Gábor Lénárt
2007-05-06 12:54 ` David Given
2007-05-06 13:46 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-06 17:13 ` David Given
2007-05-06 18:37 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-05 22:25 ` Mario Frasca
2007-05-06 9:23 ` Hans
2007-05-06 17:46 ` Luis A. Montes
2007-05-07 12:19 ` Mario Urban
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-07 18:12 chriscureau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=463CD3EB.6020506@nc.rr.com \
--to=jbruchon@nc.rr.com \
--cc=linux-8086@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox