Re: ELKS CVS imported into Git with all history

[Jody Bruchon <jody@jodybruchon.com>]

On 02/07/12 09:49, Harley Laue wrote:
> On 02/05/2012 11:14 PM, Jody wrote:
>> Hello everyone on the ELKS list; check this out:
>>
>> http://elks.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=elks/elks;a=summary
>>
>> Took me a few hours to get right, but there it is, for better or 
>> worse. You're welcome. ;-)  Now I'm going to bed.
>>
>> Jody Bruchon
> Just a curious question, is there a reason you decided to have elks, 
> elkscmd, and elksnet in the same repo instead of splitting them into 
> their own git repos?
The simplest reason is that it was far easier to do it all in one shot 
(IOW: I'm lazy); additional thoughts include:

* It's all one big project (i.e. ELKS the kernel is useless without 
commands to run)
* It seems that these components are tightly tied to each other (really, 
what use is elkscmd without the ELKS kernel?)
* elksnet is minuscule and shouldn't have its own repository; if 
anything, I feel it should be merged into elkscmd.
* I'm a minimalist and a pragmatist, and while the command sources 
should be split from the kernel sources, I see no reason to dump them 
into different repos; without an obvious and practical good reason to 
add that extra complication, I won't.

Of course, if I'm wrong in that choice, we should talk about why. 
Honestly, at this stage, ELKS is in very real danger of dropping into 
irrelevance and left to rot forever. I could care less if every command 
had its own git repo, so long as people are working on the project!

Additionally, I'd like to assemble a list of open-source compilers that 
can build for 8086 and either are targeted to other 16-bit CPUs or can 
be relatively easily retargeted (I use that term loosely with compilers. 
If anyone has suggestions for alternative compilers, please email me 
with them, and I'll build a list and examine the merits of each against 
the others. The only ones I know of are tcc (by Fabrice Bellard), SDCC 
(targets Z80 but maybe we can retarget it)...and the venerable Bruce's C 
Compiler (bcc) which we already use. I dug up the original (non-Dev86) 
source for it and the 6809 target parts are in that version, so maybe I 
can figure out how to retarget it if I can dig up a 6809 emulator somewhere.

Jody Bruchon