From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jody Bruchon <jody@jodybruchon.com>
Subject: Re: the memory model being used in elks?
Date: Sat, 09 May 2015 13:50:44 -0400
Message-ID: <554E48F4.5010406@jodybruchon.com>
References: <20150508201433.GJ8197@example.net> <20150509180333.507d7482@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> <20150509174703.GK8197@example.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150509174703.GK8197@example.net>
Sender: linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-8086.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: ELKS <linux-8086@vger.kernel.org>

On 5/9/2015 1:47 PM, u-vpoa@aetey.se wrote:
> IOW, as much as I can see, the binary is built correctly and it is
> the memory allocation by the kernel which looks surprizing.
It is my understanding that bcc assumes DS=ES=SS and both stack and heap 
data use the same code segment. How did you determine the memory usage 
of the program to be 60K? Does that include all usage or only heap usage?