From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Vikas Kumar" <walburn@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Ping!
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 22:30:40 -0400
Message-ID: <792c60620606051930k776e61e8m4ca6ef99f8707b09@mail.gmail.com>
References: <448458C5.1080400@nc.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <448458C5.1080400@nc.rr.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-8086-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-8086.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: Jody <jbruchon@nc.rr.com>
Cc: ELKS <linux-8086@vger.kernel.org>

I had a question. What is the advantage of using bcc over gcc. Why is
bcc being used in some parts of the code vs gcc in other parts of the
code. A large part of the code where bcc is used to compile uses a lot
of assembly, rather than C. Why was it written this way ? Any pointers
?

Vikas

On 6/5/06, Jody <jbruchon@nc.rr.com> wrote:
> Has anyone been doing any programming on ELKS as of late?
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-8086" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>