From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Derek Broughton" Subject: [ACPI-sppt] Re: [ACPI] merge acpi-support into acpi-devel? Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 16:42:32 +0100 Sender: acpi-support-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <002f01c389c5$047efe60$f801dc0a@direcway.com> References: <1065155697.5326.134.camel@dhcppc4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: acpi-support-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-support-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org From: "Len Brown" > It would make my life simpler if acpi-suport-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org were > merged into acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org and then disabled. > > Does having two lists make life simpler for anybody? It would if acpi-devel weren't a de-facto support list. If acpi-devel was really just for developers, I'd just subscribe to acpi-support (which I may do anyway, since I finally have a complete acpi implementation for my Inspiron 2500 with kernel 2.4.22). So far, I've been able to offer a little advice to people on acpi-support, but everything that has helped _me_ I got from acpi-devel. So, unless somebody takes it upon themselves to tell every person who asks a support-type question on acpi-devel to post on the correct list, I'd say there's not much point for the separation. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf