From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Derek Broughton Subject: Re: Re: making progress with ACPI was: ACPI small patch update Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 08:50:35 -0400 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <004401c28012$f0ebd830$3746028e@bio.dfo.ca> References: <200210300712.g9U7CFD04441@ikffws2.ikff.uni-stuttgart.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org From: "Jens Haug" > > I do agree. The more people do not want other to look/critic their code, > > the more they pretend what they do is a kind of black art, and do not > > document it or make design document :-) Fixing bug is annoying, making a > > new release and advising to report a problem on it is so more fun. > > I don't think this is about fun. There are people getting paid by > Intel for this, aren't they? Would you like it if your boss could > have a look at a list of mistakes you made in your job? Man, I sure Actually yes. When there's an official bug list, there's also an official list of stomped bugs. My current project has a list of 154 bugs, of which I've fixed all but three and those are dependent on someone else. Makes me look pretty good :-) ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf