From: "Ryan May" <rmay-GrrYUJ3DTa8@public.gmane.org>
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: CPU Performance Management
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 21:33:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00a201c2f8c8$b2019130$89106144@cyclone> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]
Hi,
I have a Toshiba 2415-s205 with a P4M-2.0GHz and have recently been toying with ACPI support in the linux kernel. So far, I have gotten two versions running: The 2.5.66 kernel with the 20030328 ACPI patch and the 2.4.20 kernel with the 20021222 ACPI patch. Neither of the kernels have any other patches applied.
I am happy to see that (with a quick look) many features work well, except for an issue with the 20030328 patch. When I cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/info I get the following output:
processor id: 0
acpi id: 1
bus mastering control: yes
power management: yes
throttling control: no
performance management: no
limit interface: no
Knowing that I have a P4M, I would have expected to have the option of performance management. Indeed, on the 20021212 patch on a 2.4.20 kernel, I have both performance management and limit interface enabled. Anyone have any clue what changed to actually disable performance management?
I've tried disassembling and recompiling my DSDT (using iasl 20030228); It gives me three identical warnings:
Package (0x00) {},
^ Effective AML package length is zero
Could this be my problem?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Ryan May
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3386 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2003-04-02 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-02 3:33 Ryan May [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-02 4:27 CPU Performance Management Grover, Andrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00a201c2f8c8$b2019130$89106144@cyclone' \
--to=rmay-grryuj3dta8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox