* CPU Performance Management
@ 2003-04-02 3:33 Ryan May
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ryan May @ 2003-04-02 3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]
Hi,
I have a Toshiba 2415-s205 with a P4M-2.0GHz and have recently been toying with ACPI support in the linux kernel. So far, I have gotten two versions running: The 2.5.66 kernel with the 20030328 ACPI patch and the 2.4.20 kernel with the 20021222 ACPI patch. Neither of the kernels have any other patches applied.
I am happy to see that (with a quick look) many features work well, except for an issue with the 20030328 patch. When I cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/info I get the following output:
processor id: 0
acpi id: 1
bus mastering control: yes
power management: yes
throttling control: no
performance management: no
limit interface: no
Knowing that I have a P4M, I would have expected to have the option of performance management. Indeed, on the 20021212 patch on a 2.4.20 kernel, I have both performance management and limit interface enabled. Anyone have any clue what changed to actually disable performance management?
I've tried disassembling and recompiling my DSDT (using iasl 20030228); It gives me three identical warnings:
Package (0x00) {},
^ Effective AML package length is zero
Could this be my problem?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Ryan May
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3386 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: CPU Performance Management
@ 2003-04-02 4:27 Grover, Andrew
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Grover, Andrew @ 2003-04-02 4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ryan May, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1700 bytes --]
We moved the processor performance stuff to the cpufreq interface. I think
the fact that we still list it in info is a bug.
Regards -- Andy
-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan May [mailto:rmay-GrrYUJ3DTa8@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:34 PM
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: [ACPI] CPU Performance Management
Hi,
I have a Toshiba 2415-s205 with a P4M-2.0GHz and have recently been toying
with ACPI support in the linux kernel. So far, I have gotten two versions
running: The 2.5.66 kernel with the 20030328 ACPI patch and the 2.4.20
kernel with the 20021222 ACPI patch. Neither of the kernels have any other
patches applied.
I am happy to see that (with a quick look) many features work well, except
for an issue with the 20030328 patch. When I cat
/proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/info I get the following output:
processor id: 0
acpi id: 1
bus mastering control: yes
power management: yes
throttling control: no
performance management: no
limit interface: no
Knowing that I have a P4M, I would have expected to have the option of
performance management. Indeed, on the 20021212 patch on a 2.4.20 kernel, I
have both performance management and limit interface enabled. Anyone have
any clue what changed to actually disable performance management?
I've tried disassembling and recompiling my DSDT (using iasl 20030228); It
gives me three identical warnings:
Package (0x00) {},
^ Effective AML package length is zero
Could this be my problem?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Ryan May
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4506 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-02 4:27 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-02 3:33 CPU Performance Management Ryan May
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-02 4:27 Grover, Andrew
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox