public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* CPU Performance Management
@ 2003-04-02  3:33 Ryan May
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ryan May @ 2003-04-02  3:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1337 bytes --]

Hi,

I have a Toshiba 2415-s205 with a P4M-2.0GHz and have recently been toying with ACPI support in the linux kernel.  So far, I have gotten two versions running: The 2.5.66 kernel with the 20030328 ACPI patch and the 2.4.20 kernel with the 20021222 ACPI patch.  Neither of the kernels have any other patches applied.

I am happy to see that (with a quick look) many features work well, except for an issue with the 20030328 patch.  When I cat /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/info I get the following output:

processor id:                      0
acpi id:                              1
bus mastering control:        yes
power management:           yes
throttling control:                no
performance management:  no
limit interface:                    no

Knowing that I have a P4M, I would have expected to have the option of performance management.  Indeed, on the 20021212 patch on a 2.4.20 kernel, I have both performance management and limit interface enabled.  Anyone have any clue what changed to actually disable performance management?

I've tried disassembling and recompiling my DSDT (using iasl 20030228);  It gives me three identical warnings:

Package (0x00) {},
                    ^ Effective AML package length is zero

Could this be my problem?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Ryan May

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3386 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* RE: CPU Performance Management
@ 2003-04-02  4:27 Grover, Andrew
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Grover, Andrew @ 2003-04-02  4:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ryan May, acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1700 bytes --]

We moved the processor performance stuff to the cpufreq interface. I think
the fact that we still list it in info is a bug.
 
Regards -- Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan May [mailto:rmay-GrrYUJ3DTa8@public.gmane.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:34 PM
To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: [ACPI] CPU Performance Management


Hi,
 
I have a Toshiba 2415-s205 with a P4M-2.0GHz and have recently been toying
with ACPI support in the linux kernel.  So far, I have gotten two versions
running: The 2.5.66 kernel with the 20030328 ACPI patch and the 2.4.20
kernel with the 20021222 ACPI patch.  Neither of the kernels have any other
patches applied.
 
I am happy to see that (with a quick look) many features work well, except
for an issue with the 20030328 patch.  When I cat
/proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/info I get the following output:
 
processor id:                      0
acpi id:                              1
bus mastering control:        yes
power management:           yes
throttling control:                no
performance management:  no
limit interface:                    no
 
Knowing that I have a P4M, I would have expected to have the option of
performance management.  Indeed, on the 20021212 patch on a 2.4.20 kernel, I
have both performance management and limit interface enabled.  Anyone have
any clue what changed to actually disable performance management?
 
I've tried disassembling and recompiling my DSDT (using iasl 20030228);  It
gives me three identical warnings:
 
Package (0x00) {},
                    ^ Effective AML package length is zero
 
Could this be my problem?
 
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Ryan May
 


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4506 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-02  4:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-02  3:33 CPU Performance Management Ryan May
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-02  4:27 Grover, Andrew

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox