Re: [RFC v1 0/8] acpi/x86: s2idle: Introduce and implement runtime standby ABI for ACPI s0ix platforms

[Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>]

On 3/16/26 22:52, Antheas Kapenekakis wrote:
>> So in accordance with the above, /sys/power/standby is not a very
>> fortunate choice of the name of this interface and I'm totally
>> unconvinced that it belongs to sys/power because its role is not
>> really power management (and it is ACPI-only for the time being).
> Hm, most of the changes / implementation resides in the pm subsystem
> and it is related to the s2idle suspend flow.
> 
> I assume that when it stops being ACPI only provided we reach a design
> that allows for that, the related callbacks would also nest in pm ops.
> 
> Where could a more appropriate directory in sysfs be? I would still
> tend towards /sys/power

Question is whether anyone outside of ACPI will ever need the generic
interface. Making it generic based on guesswork could be a wasted effort
that Rafael and others will have to maintain. The mode file could go
under /sys/firmware/acpi if interface is made ACPI-specific.

Will be good if you could demonstrate a need in making interface
generic, if there are any devices on your mind that could make use of it
right away. Old interface can be deprecated if a better new appears.

Either way is okay to me, but Rafael is the PM expert and I'd do as he
wants it to be.

-- 
Best regards,
Dmitry