From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Pearson <mpearson@lenovo.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Evaluate all Low-Power S0 Idle _DSM functions
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 14:40:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <08742373-ca86-47e5-ab6c-e2e3189eb9fe@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12427214.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher>
On 4/23/2024 14:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> Commit 073237281a50 ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Enable Low-Power S0 Idle MSFT
> UUID for non-AMD systems") attempted to avoid evaluating the same Low-
> Power S0 Idle _DSM functions for different UUIDs, but that turns out to
> be a mistake, because some systems in the field are adversely affected
> by it.
>
> Address this by allowing all Low-Power S0 Idle _DSM functions to be
> evaluated, but still print the message regarding duplication of Low-
> Power S0 Idle _DSM function sets for different UUIDs.
>
> Fixes: 073237281a50 ("ACPI: PM: s2idle: Enable Low-Power S0 Idle MSFT UUID for non-AMD systems")
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218750
> Reported-and-tested-by: Mark Pearson <mpearson@lenovo.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Ah glad to hear that my idea worked. FWIW we saw the same type of issue
on some AMD systems when we first introduced the MSFT UUID.
Suggested-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/x86/s2idle.c
> @@ -492,16 +492,14 @@ static int lps0_device_attach(struct acp
> unsigned int func_mask;
>
> /*
> - * Avoid evaluating the same _DSM function for two
> - * different UUIDs and prioritize the MSFT one.
> + * Log a message if the _DSM function sets for two
> + * different UUIDs overlap.
> */
> func_mask = lps0_dsm_func_mask & lps0_dsm_func_mask_microsoft;
> - if (func_mask) {
> + if (func_mask)
> acpi_handle_info(adev->handle,
> "Duplicate LPS0 _DSM functions (mask: 0x%x)\n",
> func_mask);
> - lps0_dsm_func_mask &= ~func_mask;
> - }
> }
> }
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 19:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-23 19:19 [PATCH v1] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Evaluate all Low-Power S0 Idle _DSM functions Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-04-23 19:40 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2024-04-23 19:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=08742373-ca86-47e5-ab6c-e2e3189eb9fe@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpearson@lenovo.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox