public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
	bhelgaas@google.com, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com,
	linux@rainbow-software.org, timur@codeaurora.org,
	cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	wim@djo.tudelft.nl, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:32:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0a82f2ef-b072-d847-104a-320cf804ebd5@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4a8995e-1454-3b84-0681-1491788087ec@codeaurora.org>

Sorry, I think I didn't have enough morning coffee.

Looking at these again and trying to be specific.

On 10/18/2016 8:20 AM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> It seems wrong to me that we call acpi_irq_get_penalty() from
>> acpi_irq_penalty_update() and acpi_penalize_isa_irq().  It seems like they
>> should just manipulate acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] directly.
>> 
>> acpi_irq_penalty_update() is for command-line parameters, so it certainly
>> doesn't need the acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() information (the
>> acpi_link_list should be empty at the time we process the command-line
>> parameters).

Calling acpi_irq_get_penalty for ISA IRQ is OK as long as it doesn't have
any dynamic IRQ calculation such that acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty.

If this is broken, then we need special care so that we don't assign
dynamically calcualted sci_penalty back to acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq]. This
results in returning incorrect penalty as

acpi_irq_get_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_original_penalty[irq] + 2 * sci_penalty.

Now that we added sci_penalty into the acpi_irq_get_penalty function,
calling acpi_irq_get_penalty is not correct anymore. This line here needs to
be replaced with acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] as you suggested.

                if (used)
                        new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
                                        PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED;
                else
                        new_penalty = 0;

                acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = new_penalty;


>> 
>> acpi_penalize_isa_irq() is telling us that a PNP or ACPI device is using
>> the IRQ -- this should modify the IRQ's penalty, but it shouldn't depend on
>> the acpi_irq_pci_sharing_penalty() value at all.
>> 

Same problem here. This line will be broken after the sci_penalty change.

                acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) +
                  (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING);




-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-18 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-15  4:31 [PATCH V3 0/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: revert penalty calculation for ISA and SCI interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15  4:31 ` [PATCH V3 1/3] ACPI, PCI IRQ: add PCI_USING penalty for ISA interrupts Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 12:39   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-15 16:58     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-18 13:59   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-18 15:20     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-18 15:32       ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2016-10-19 22:44         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-19 23:17           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-21  0:59             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-20 20:01           ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-20 21:08             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-20 21:25               ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-21  2:41             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-21  3:01               ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-19 22:24     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-22 23:58   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-24  4:16     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15  4:31 ` [PATCH V3 2/3] Revert "ACPI,PCI,IRQ: remove SCI penalize function" Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15 13:06   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-10-18 14:05   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2016-10-18 15:05     ` Sinan Kaya
2016-10-15  4:31 ` [PATCH V3 3/3] ACPI,PCI,IRQ: correct SCI penalty calculation Sinan Kaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0a82f2ef-b072-d847-104a-320cf804ebd5@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=agross@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rainbow-software.org \
    --cc=ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=wim@djo.tudelft.nl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox