From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "EC: Install address space handler at the namespace root" causing issues for some users
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 13:28:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0abc1a17-e155-4587-ada9-13f9ce5f358b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0e5414a-ec7b-44e3-980c-e71889150767@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 8/1/24 4:28 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/29/24 1:15 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> There are 2 bug reports:
>>
>> 1. Brightness up/down key-presses no longer working on LG laptop (acpi-video related):
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/V2KWAGZIAX4TOWPCH6A6FSIT66PR3KMZ/
>
> I have filed:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302253
>
> to track this now and an acpidump of the troublesome LG laptop
> is attached there. I have also requested dmesg output of
> a non working kernel to be attached there.
>
> As a reminder this is the bug where it has been confirmed that
> reverting "EC: Install address space handler at the namespace root"
> helps, with the caveat that there is a Thunderbolt related IRQ
> storm on the ACPI event IRQ after the revert ...
Ok, so the bugzilla now has 2 different dmesg outputs:
1. 6.9.6, this kernel works without problems
2. 6.9.12 with the following patch you suggested on top:
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -1788,7 +1788,7 @@ void __init acpi_ec_dsdt_probe(void)
* At this point, the GPE is not fully initialized, so do not to
* handle the events.
*/
- ret = acpi_ec_setup(ec, NULL, true);
+ ret = acpi_ec_setup(ec, NULL, false);
if (ret) {
acpi_ec_free(ec);
return;
Unfortunately this does not help. dmesg shows some EC _REG errors, which
are now (with the above diff applied) shown just before the
"Boot DSDT EC initialization complete" message, which shows that _REG now
runs from acpi_ec_add() rather then before:
[ 1.007566] ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_TZ.FN00._OFF], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/psargs-330)
[ 1.007576] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00.LPCB.H_EC.EREG due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-52
[ 1.007580] ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00.LPCB.H_EC._REG due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-52
[ 1.007639] ACPI: EC: interrupt unblocked
[ 1.007640] ACPI: EC: event unblocked
[ 1.007675] ACPI: EC: EC_CMD/EC_SC=0x66, EC_DATA=0x62
[ 1.007676] ACPI: EC: GPE=0x6e
[ 1.007677] ACPI: \_SB_.PC00.LPCB.LGEC: Boot DSDT EC initialization complete
[ 1.007679] ACPI: \_SB_.PC00.LPCB.LGEC: EC: Used to handle transactions and events
Note that the errors are from calling _REG on \_SB.PC00.LPCB.H_EC, where as the actual
EC (and the only acpi_device on which _REG would get called for the EC Opregion before) is:
\_SB_.PC00.LPCB.LGEC.
Looking at the DSDT it seems that the H_EC is not used and is leftover from a copy/paste
from some reference design DSDT. Its _REG however does write to the EC before hitting the error
and I think that that write may be causing the issue...
The H_EC device does have an _STA method and looking closer the troublesome EREG method is
also called from _INI. So I guess that _STA is returning 0 causing _INI to not run and
that is the reason why we are not seeing the same EREG errors with kernel 6.9.6 where _REG is
only called for the EC opregion on \_SB_.PC00.LPCB.LGEC and not for the entire ACPI device
hierarchy as is done with >= 6.9.7 .
Maybe we should only call _REG for the EC opregion on present devices (and devices without
a _STA)?
Also note that both LGEC and H_EC use the same cmd + data ports.
I'll go and ask the reporter to retreive the status of both LGEC and H_EC and then see
from there.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-05 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-29 11:15 "EC: Install address space handler at the namespace root" causing issues for some users Hans de Goede
2024-07-29 11:29 ` Hans de Goede
2024-07-29 12:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-01 11:15 ` Hans de Goede
2024-08-01 14:28 ` Hans de Goede
2024-08-05 11:28 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2024-08-05 12:47 ` Hans de Goede
2024-08-08 17:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-09 13:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-09 18:02 ` Armin Wolf
2024-08-12 11:34 ` Hans de Goede
2024-08-12 11:28 ` Hans de Goede
2024-08-12 11:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-13 8:45 ` Hans de Goede
2024-08-13 10:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-08-13 10:45 ` Hans de Goede
2024-08-13 10:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0abc1a17-e155-4587-ada9-13f9ce5f358b@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox