RE: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node

[Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> Sent: 17 May 2022 08:18
> To: 'Lorenzo Pieralisi' <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>; Robin Murphy
> <robin.murphy@arm.com>; rafael@kernel.org; joro@8bytes.org
> Cc: Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>;
> steven.price@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com; jon@solid-run.com;
> eric.auger@redhat.com; laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com; hch@infradead.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lorenzo Pieralisi [mailto:lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com]
> > Sent: 13 May 2022 10:50
> > To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>; Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>; rafael@kernel.org;
> > joro@8bytes.org
> > Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> > Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo) <guohanjun@huawei.com>;
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> > iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> > will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>;
> > steven.price@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com; jon@solid-run.com;
> > eric.auger@redhat.com; laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com; hch@infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
> >
> > [with Christoph's correct email address]
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:07:00AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > On 2022-05-10 08:23, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> > > > Hi Joerg/Robin,
> > > >
> > > > I think this series is now ready to be merged. Could you please let
> > > > me know if there is anything missing.
> > >
> > > Fine by me - these patches have had enough review and testing now that
> > > even if anything else did come up, I think it would be better done as
> > > follow-up work on the merged code.
> >
> > Given the ACPICA dependency I believe it is best for this series
> > to go via the ACPI tree, right ?
> >
> > I assume there are all the required ACKs for that to happen.
> 
> The SMMUv3/SMMU related changes (patches 6 - 9) still doesn't have
> explicit ACK from maintainers other than the go ahead above from Robin.
> 
> Just thought of highlighting it as not sure that will be an issue or not.
> 

All,

Just a gentle ping on this series again. Any chance this can make into 5.19?

Please consider.

Thanks,
Shameer