From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E0CD19AA73 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 10:45:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723545918; cv=none; b=owLy6L7Pka/58LEBT7X2vX4Vm2j35gozGqEn2RS3ZqMLKJTaQ1Pxp5mZB2G9+foUV/rnagplbsqJFZC/ep/j3dCyXF2QSxt+RirYFeaQKQnSuVWddusiZyWU3v3J3gUJM487ZQdVO9Nx7EsyjSRTzNgSBJz93V6R8XCyQlE6s0Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723545918; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OBvw1xaU/uaECzu9DtzI0ayeZxwt6yRRTIuFeQaME/s=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=WtsPAVhcOakz/yCIkum4he7RcnoggAJ/T7yjZIeyNK2I8tIxP1fXKyu273dyoXFJdZ82NeyqTtFPHQSpGUvP1PeJv+qrSs9i7v62cSkRoGfP1O+Abx2wXye6lAgT2DYDpUO7roQb/GzJ49C/A3ugY98P6MIqoFUBT7vYCWYeKz4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=ikrdPgnr; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ikrdPgnr" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1723545916; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=GNmAUQqPRhlKyJzPZ4t2TEAUMGFO9HvOUN+BVuraMug=; b=ikrdPgnr6TRPEmXDOhJu4bvT0G9tDg/yAXDBb4tEet/C9jABWoTioorWLIbDn9huC5T1VR nN/42xtFXN0LkGWtySJTCLO/6sGyAS+tC4X83XPJ6fNL4OxFJPwobhqxB24D/kMBh3M3Yc NJUUN7BIdzQXSrwC2d8c2v8IcB00JN0= Received: from mail-ej1-f72.google.com (mail-ej1-f72.google.com [209.85.218.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-426-1d8AC7I7Mn6H56PXyAMXQg-1; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 06:45:14 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 1d8AC7I7Mn6H56PXyAMXQg-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f72.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a80c12dede1so365542266b.0 for ; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:45:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1723545913; x=1724150713; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:content-language :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GNmAUQqPRhlKyJzPZ4t2TEAUMGFO9HvOUN+BVuraMug=; b=DcSjK0R6RP1puDR+DeY2rpWCuxH6B9UDsIy3/sTC8o+/EZ3QtRuut6+VkgL/ZdTWMH DbS24KapEC6NQiC5kE0yaBeohr5fP/OgIsOK+KNpFcj/le9soq1r6AtA82UJg//svAVd kq4drwWA6L+oHnKusXeaW9+WAlF39WdCIK4HxzxDQz6CNBtvIR65RtRBwbqqVlNwS1R/ QLkLt0oNtWfefMZgx7KEKEoqks+nOy6LbjUiol2lMLvwD7AImXbnMIEFFwFtEdpIR18n HXlIZkRK2tqY1beunJTHayiGE6i1Wp9WVBTFYO25YpG6uLJECji2POKieVm215Sdcoff f1NA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx187QLkS3kFLE4djeHicc6sBT5TM+r4h2pfQr6AS8jZgZXaF47 4XFivtoC+8GIYxkHJMlcKMUWoqUndwkVhDgDrX0qmAANCBz7gqu9qpEXiGY1ZzOc0pzmZK3pO63 CR9FavB3pnMMxgbvelYDaCTOP92f3LWD2B7rqW3/CMvGktuY6TQGDHXNRU+CKqC/EYig= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7f8c:b0:a77:cdae:6a59 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a80f0c1c0ecmr204697666b.21.1723545913322; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:45:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGg3y/swaARDzsXVvBVaNqZCETbPKUlsdwQytOh/1DnlkwkGT0FqiFSr9vqAKpmsmiVUt6FIQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7f8c:b0:a77:cdae:6a59 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a80f0c1c0ecmr204695766b.21.1723545912738; Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec? (2001-1c00-0c32-7800-5bfa-a036-83f0-f9ec.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-a80f3f4981dsm60266666b.18.2024.08.13.03.45.12 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Aug 2024 03:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0e6faf83-d8aa-48aa-a49a-ec28b0d56e8e@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 12:45:11 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: "EC: Install address space handler at the namespace root" causing issues for some users To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-acpi References: <1f76b7e2-1928-4598-8037-28a1785c2d13@redhat.com> <0abc1a17-e155-4587-ada9-13f9ce5f358b@redhat.com> <1a426f61-1454-4a77-8262-612ab1d0d265@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US, nl From: Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Rafael, On 8/13/24 12:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 10:46 AM Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> Hi, >> > > [cut] > >> >> The reporter of 2302253 has reported that the patches from: >> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-ec-fixes >> >> resolve the issue; and as mentioned before the reporter of 2298938 >> is not responsive atm. So I believe that with it confirmed that this >> at least fixes the issues on the LG Gram laptops (1) these patches are >> ready to be merged now. > > Thanks for the information! > > I'll go ahead and put them into linux-next. Great. Question is the intention for these to go to Linus in the 6.12 cycle, or do you just want to let them bake a bit in linux-next and then plan to send them as a fix for the 6.11 cycle ? The reason I'm asking is because the patches these replace cause a regression on some laptops models starting with 6.9.7 and also all 6.10.y kernels (and if you wait till 6.12, also all 6.11.y) kernels. So although this is a somewhat bigger change my personal preference would be for these to get send out as fixes and backported to kernels >= 6.9 (1). Regards, Hans 1) Just like how the patches they replace end up getting backported to 6.9.7 > >> 1) And based on dmesg with a regressed kernel likely / hopefully also >> the issue from RH bugzilla 2298938. >> >