public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carl Thompson <cet-GxmFRYwVNOxKOnpN5g9PlQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Johnathan Hicks <thetech-Pn2JTpibVOrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel
	<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: CX > 1 support for Athlon SMP systems
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 11:40:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1027536051.3d3ef4b31fef6@carlthompson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D3E14D9.50009-Pn2JTpibVOrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>

Quoting Johnathan Hicks <thetech-Pn2JTpibVOrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>: 
 
> Carl Thompson wrote: 
> > Wow.  This actually seems to work on my Sony laptops.  But I 
> > wonder if it is really puting the CPU in C2 because there is no 
> > additional power savings or temperature reduction than using ACPI.  
> > Is there any way to test if CPU is going in C2 state?  
>  
> I can't think of anything at the hardware level, but you do a printk 
> or something inside the while loop that contains the inb() in the 
> idle loop. 
 
What I mean is I know the loop is executing, but how do I know the 
processor is _really_ in C2?  I was expecting a significant change in 
batterly life and CPU temp vs. the C1 state that ACPI put my CPU in.  
I haven't run definitive tests, but at best I'm only at most 15-20 
minutes more battery life (if any at all). 
 
> ... 
 
> --John 
 
Carl Thompson 
 


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-07-24 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <3D3B879A.5020401@folkwolf.net>
     [not found] ` <1027351350.3d3c23363ea3d@carlthompson.net>
     [not found]   ` <3D3CBF78.4010007@folkwolf.net>
     [not found]     ` <3D3CBF78.4010007-Pn2JTpibVOrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2002-07-23 22:06       ` CX > 1 support for Athlon SMP systems Carl Thompson
2002-07-24  2:45         ` Johnathan Hicks
     [not found]           ` <3D3E14D9.50009-Pn2JTpibVOrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2002-07-24 18:40             ` Carl Thompson [this message]
2002-07-25  2:39               ` Johnathan Hicks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1027536051.3d3ef4b31fef6@carlthompson.net \
    --to=cet-gxmfrywvnoxkonpn5g9plq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=thetech-Pn2JTpibVOrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox