From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Legbandt Subject: Re: [20030321] Failed to acquire semaphore Date: 23 Mar 2003 19:30:23 -0800 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1048476623.3112.2.camel@suburbia> References: <20030323203025.GA13039@hell.org.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20030323203025.GA13039-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2003-03-23 at 12:30, Karol Kozimor wrote: > Mar 23 20:12:30 nadir kernel: osl-0888 [24] os_wait_semaphore : Failed to acquire semaphore[cfff74c0|1|0], AE_TIME > Mar 23 20:12:30 nadir kernel: utmisc-0743 [23] ut_acquire_mutex : Thread 0 could not acquire Mutex [ACPI_MTX_Events] AE_TIME > #v- > > Occasionally (e.g. upon a notify or event), the two last lines reappear, > and ACPI events are not handled otherwise (i.e. acpid fails to notice > them). I am seeing the same issue with 2.4.21-pre5, the 20030321 acpi patch and no other patches. Since I run this on my laptop, my question is whether this is going to negatively affect the lifespan of my laptop. On the other hand, now even with the power plugged in my battery is always recognized... -Josh -- Joshua Legbandt ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en