Re: the incremental patch 20030521-20030528

["Sérgio Monteiro Basto" <sergiomb-hHo3WeeoaswVhHzd4jOs4w@public.gmane.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1622 bytes --]

Make the incremental patch is easy: apply the old patch to kernel and
the new patch to a copy of same kernel version, clean orig (and rej)
files and make the diff -Nur. 

so here is the result, and don't test is yet.


On Sat, 2003-03-29 at 15:16, Karol Kozimor wrote:
> Thus wrote Grover, Andrew:
> > Fixed a problem where the error message "Failed to acquire semaphore"
> > would appear during operations on the embedded controller (EC). 
> 
> Thanks for that!
> I have one question though. Did you consider doing incremental ACPI
> patches? I'm using a heavily patched kernel with XFS filesystem support,
> and getting all these patches to work and applying all the rejects manually
> is a real pain. Incremental patches would really make life (mine, at least) 
> easier. What do you think about it?
> 
> (the above refers to the 2.4 kernel, with 2.5 changing so fast it isn't
> really a problem)
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> -- 
> Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor
> sziwan-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
> NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
> _______________________________________________
> Acpi-devel mailing list
> Acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/acpi-devel
-- 
SérgioMB
email: sergiomb-hHo3WeeoaswVhHzd4jOs4w@public.gmane.org

Who gives me one shell, give me everything.

[-- Attachment #2: 05210528.diff.gz --]
[-- Type: application/x-gzip, Size: 6259 bytes --]