From: Raul Aranda Blasco <raul.aranda-fE4FmR91nWqXOwHavGvsmg@public.gmane.org>
To: Daniele Boffi <boffi-piYtxHxN1XRAly3Pu9w1wA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: fan control
Date: 01 May 2003 20:56:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1051815380.608.17.camel@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030501203309.B1662-xzhXYMPkGmXoPXhRcRtihA@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 948 bytes --]
On Thu, 2003-05-01 at 20:33, Daniele Boffi wrote:
> I think I didn't explain the question correctly. The fans and the thermal zones
> do work well. No problems at all. I was just wondering about the consequences
> of playing with the fans (like I did with changing their status). If I reboot,
> then the next session is OK..., but within the same session, suppose I just
> switch the fans from one to two and then back to one. Then, I start some heavy
> job and the temperature increases. Will then the kernel spin the fun up or my
> previous action prevents it from doing so?
That's what I meant before
After changing the fan speeds and stopping them, try to compiling a
kernel and use "acpi -V" to see how the temperature goes up and the fan
starts to work (managed by the thermal zone).
--
Un saludo
Raul Aranda Blasco
raul.aranda-fE4FmR91nWqXOwHavGvsmg@public.gmane.org
http://elistan.dragon-lance.net
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-01 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-01 16:51 fan control Daniele Boffi
[not found] ` <20030501185137.C926-xzhXYMPkGmXoPXhRcRtihA@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-01 18:23 ` Raul Aranda Blasco
[not found] ` <1051813408.607.3.camel-bi+AKbBUZKZeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-01 18:33 ` Daniele Boffi
[not found] ` <20030501203309.B1662-xzhXYMPkGmXoPXhRcRtihA@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-01 18:56 ` Raul Aranda Blasco [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-02 8:17 Herbert Nachtnebel
[not found] ` <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F12EC9A-PWLG29+z7hEKeIAE67mlpo2P0GrZ+RbP@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-02 8:31 ` Daniele Boffi
[not found] ` <20030502103102.A2867-xzhXYMPkGmXoPXhRcRtihA@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-02 8:56 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20030502085643.GH2954-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-02 9:23 ` Markus Gaugusch
2003-05-02 9:03 ` Franck SICARD
2003-05-02 9:24 ` Stefan Behnel
[not found] ` <3EB23932.9090508-8NdywcgfOMlWMvVl7B+zuCEWGD4kr0XT@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-02 11:38 ` Ducrot Bruno
[not found] ` <20030502113819.GJ2954-j6u/t2rXLliUoIHC/UFpr9i2O/JbrIOy@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-06 9:21 ` Éric Brunet
[not found] ` <20030506092120.GA24982-l5PIGlIYzrxGWvitb5QawA@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-06 10:56 ` Adachi, Kenichi
[not found] ` <01bb01c313be$1845afc0$b8d21b2b-5Bsh/8v8vXc@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-06 15:04 ` Ducrot Bruno
2003-05-02 9:53 ` Daniele Boffi
2003-05-02 10:30 Herbert Nachtnebel
2003-05-02 10:50 Herbert Nachtnebel
[not found] ` <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F0D409F-PWLG29+z7hEKeIAE67mlpo2P0GrZ+RbP@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-02 11:04 ` Daniele Boffi
2003-05-02 11:11 Herbert Nachtnebel
[not found] ` <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F12EC9E-PWLG29+z7hEKeIAE67mlpo2P0GrZ+RbP@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-02 11:17 ` Daniele Boffi
2003-05-02 11:41 Herbert Nachtnebel
[not found] <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F0D40A0@andromeda.agcad.local>
[not found] ` <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F0D40A0-PWLG29+z7hEKeIAE67mlpo2P0GrZ+RbP@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-02 11:43 ` Daniele Boffi
2003-05-02 12:00 Herbert Nachtnebel
[not found] ` <B900970C7DD9474C972986EB3EC7C58F0D40A1-PWLG29+z7hEKeIAE67mlpo2P0GrZ+RbP@public.gmane.org>
2003-05-02 12:06 ` Daniele Boffi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1051815380.608.17.camel@localhost \
--to=raul.aranda-fe4fmr91nwqxowhavgvsmg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=boffi-piYtxHxN1XRAly3Pu9w1wA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox