From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Owen Cliffe Subject: Re: Samsung X10 XTC 1300 Date: 03 May 2003 18:07:39 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1051981659.1661.27.camel@noodle> References: <200305031848.04583.nbellm@gmx.de> <1051979022.24562.24.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1051979022.24562.24.camel-2MMpYkNvuYAXoXS6vNje7nviChZXdy279dF7HbQ/qKg@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Cc: nbellm-Mmb7MZpHnFY@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2003-05-03 at 17:23, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sad, 2003-05-03 at 17:48, Nicolas Bellm wrote: > > Hello! > > I have a Samsung X10 XTC 1300 with Intel Centrino. I downloaded the > > kernel-2.4.20 and patched it with 2.4.21-rc1 and the ACPI patch. I compiled > > and loaded all modules for ACPI. But I can't get it in the sleep-mode. I > > tried 'echo 1 > /etc/acpi/sleep', I tried echo 2, 3, 4, 5 ... and echo P1-P5, > > but it doesn't work. It doesnt react, when I press the powerbutton. I can't > > change the processor speed, I can't read the battery loading. Nothing works. > > Most people using Centrino seem to be reporting similar things. You > might want to swap it for a more Linux friendly laptop if you really > need ACPI stuff or working wireless indeed i have had CPU scaling working with CPUFreq on my dell D600 (Dell is rapidly becoming the Ikea of computer vendors :) but the same problems with ACPI sleep. (S1 works, S3 doesn't, although S5 does) when ACPI does work then when bus modules are loading i get a lot of: dsobject-0189: *** Warning: Buffer created with zero length in AML this is using the ACPI4Linux patches against 2.4.20 and 2.4.21-rc1 ACPI didn't load at all in 2.4.21-rc1-ac2 though (i don't have the exact message to hand, but something about signatures being incorrect maybe) i have settled on a reasonable compromise of using swsusp with ACPI on 2.4.20 (using a patch from http://alor.antifork.org/acpi-swsusp/) which is acceptable and works (i think you need at least S5 to work for swsusp to turn the machine off) /proc/acpi/processor/CPU0/performance reports the requisite number of P states but the associated CPU speed for all of them is 0Mhz also weirdly i can change the P state from P0 but only to P5 or P6 and then i can't change it back again (although this doesn't seem to have a great deal of effect) throttling changing works (i.e. the T state changes) but i'm not entirely convinced it is actually doing anything. owen ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf