From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Moore Subject: RE: _PDC method in DSDT Date: 22 Jun 2003 21:17:25 -0700 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1056341845.10322.44.camel@aldebaran.caltech.edu> References: <00be01c33922$b8fb3cd0$b8d21b2b@ADACHIPC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <00be01c33922$b8fb3cd0$b8d21b2b-5Bsh/8v8vXc@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Adachi, Kenichi" Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Thanks, that's exactly what I needed. Given this document, I think I have enough information now to patch processor.c to support Enhanced Speedstep on Pentium M for those BIOSes that have a correctly written _PDC method in the DSDT. Would the maintainers of the ACPI driver be willing to accept such a patch? Regards, David On Sun, 2003-06-22 at 17:59, Adachi, Kenichi wrote: > Hi, > > > Does anyone know the purpose or specification of the _PDC method of > the DSDT? > > It's another annoyance (?) added by Microsoft -); > Document is available online at the following URL: > > "Windows Native Processor Performance Control" > http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/hwdev/tech/onnow/procperfctrl.mspx > > Thanks, > - Adachi, Kenichi > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php