RE: [ACPI] _PDC method in DSDT

Arjan van de Ven
2003-06-23T07:59:11Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 559 bytes --]

On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 09:11, Grover, Andrew wrote:

> However, since the recently added non-vendor-supported Pentium M cpufreq
> driver uses hardcoded tables and cpuid instead of relying on ACPI for
> this information anyways, adding _PDC support to processor.c would not
> affect its behavior. If that driver were changed to use ACPI for
> determining platform capabilities, like Windows and our released binary
> driver do, then yes, adding _PDC support would be important.

Intel is more than welcome to release the linux driver under the GPL :)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]