From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Albert Cahalan Subject: RE: region size computed incorrectly Date: 01 Sep 2003 00:19:51 -0400 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1062389990.314.35.camel@cube> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: "Grover, Andrew" Cc: Albert Cahalan , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, "Moore, Robert" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 15:49, Grover, Andrew wrote: > I was able to reproduce this. Putting LPCR in the HPET scope instead of > the parent scope (by removing the ^s) seems to be a temporary > workaround. We appear to be creating 2 LPCR objects, 1 of which is > initialized correctly and 1 which is zeroed out. We look at the > not-initialized one, and throw errors. > > BTW PNP0103 is the HPET, High Precision Event Timer. I don't know how > people are supposed to request PNP IDs these days, but the HPET spec > says 0103, so I guess they got it. :) Any hope for a fix? The 2.6.0-test5 kernel will be using the HPET for timekeeping. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf