From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joshua Schmidlkofer Subject: Re: ACPI + SiS IRQ Routing? Date: 10 Oct 2003 16:10:34 -0700 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1065827434.26428.35.camel@bubbles.imr-net.com> References: <1065658665.26205.8.camel@menion.home> <1065823816.14982.3.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1065823816.14982.3.camel-Z+iYsftfazAXoXS6vNje7nviChZXdy279dF7HbQ/qKg@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: ACPI List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 15:10, Alan Cox wrote: > On Iau, 2003-10-09 at 01:17, Joshua Schmidlkofer wrote: > > What is the status of the SiS IRQ router? I have two motherboards, one > > with a 645, and one with a 648. I have confirmed that all the way up to > > [and including] 2.6.0-test6 I am having problems. I am going to test > > with mm4, but on another system I experienced a wierd Oops with mm4. > > Unless Linus and Andrew have forward ported the 2.4 PIRQ rewrite then > the SiS hardware won't work right with 2.6 in non ACPI mode at least. > > Alan > Does anyone have some hope about dealing with this going forward? The 648 at least behaves better than the 645. I don't know how much of a corner-case I represent, but advice would be cool. js ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php