From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: [PM][ACPI] No ACPI interrupts after resume from S1 Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 12:59:57 +1300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1067039997.2114.16.camel@laptop-linux> References: <20031020141512.GA30157@hell.org.pl> <20031020184750.GA26154@hell.org.pl> <20031023082534.GD643@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <3F98FDDF.1040905@cyberone.com.au> <20031024222347.GB728@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-reply-to: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Some modules cause problems. If I suspend with the intel-agp driver loaded, for example, the computer reboots when copying the original kernel back, because the hardware state doesn't match. I can suspend an= d resume my i830 based laptop just fine without it. Once the right change= s are made to the driver, the module will work, but not yet. Pavel, excuse me for jumping in here. Regards, Nigel On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 11:45, M=E5ns Rullg=E5rd wrote: > Pavel Machek writes: >=20 > > Try it completely without modules. I'm not sure how it should work > > with modules which means it probably does not work at all. >=20 > Are you saying it doesn't work with any modules? What about all the > people who have reported success with suspend-to-disk? I thought > everyone used at least some modules. --=20 Nigel Cunningham 495 St Georges Road South, Hastings 4201, New Zealand Evolution (n): A hypothetical process whereby infinitely improbable eve= nts occur=20 with alarming frequency, order arises from chaos, and no one is given c= redit.