From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: Dell D600: teaching radeonfb how to wake up... Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:24:32 +1100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1069374272.723.44.camel@gaston> References: <20031119180119.GB22307@tate.loria.fr> <20031120111315.GB432@openzaurus.ucw.cz> <1069370504.705.32.camel@gaston> <20031120234708.GA431@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20031120234708.GA431-I/5MKhXcvmPrBKCeMvbIDA@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: To: Pavel Machek Cc: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2003-11-21 at 10:47, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > If I were you, I'd create fix_ati.o module which would > > > "do the stuff", then insert it over network. That should > > > make debugging easier... > > > > Nah, we really have to re-POST the chip. I don't know how > > we are supposed to do that though. Either we'll have to have > > the full POST code for a bunch of ATI chips around, which doesn't > > seem reasonable and I don't think windows drivers do that, or > > Well, if he wants to do the work for his concrete ATI chip, its fine > with me, and I'd like to see the results. > > Having fix_ati.o module is certainly easier than playing with driver > model for testing... My point is that he can probably NOT do the work, POSTing such a chip is hell. I'm trying to figure out how we are supposed to do, that is how ATI does with their own windows drivers ... Ben. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/