From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nils Faerber Subject: Re: Interrupt routing problem Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:41:08 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1074163267.1143.2.camel@localhost> References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F8401720CC3@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20040113090003.GB3599@hell.org.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040113090003.GB3599-DETuoxkZsSqrDJvtcaxF/A@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Karol Kozimor Cc: "Yu, Luming" , "Brown, Len" , ACPI Developers List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Am Di, den 13.01.2004 schrieb Karol Kozimor um 10:00: > Thus wrote Yu, Luming: > > > (I believe > > > there was a patch I tested and found working). > > What patch ? > I believe it was the one attached below -- my bookmarks went wild some time > ago and I can't tell the bugzilla no., but it's certainly there. [acpi_hw_enable_ec_gpes() patch] I have tested this with 2.4.24 and at least it does no harm ;) Since I do not know enough to judge if it is really necessary at least from my point of view I would suggest to add it to the general ACPI code. > Best regards, CU nils faerber -- kernel concepts Tel: +49-271-771091-12 Dreisbachstr. 24 Fax: +49-271-771091-19 D-57250 Netphen D1 : +49-170-2729106 -- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html