public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 2.6] (4/5) add _PDC support
@ 2004-01-29 10:59 Dominik Brodowski
  2004-01-31  5:46 ` Len Brown
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dominik Brodowski @ 2004-01-29 10:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: len.brown, acpi-devel; +Cc: cpufreq

Add support for _PDC to the ACPI processor "Performance States library" 
(perflib). If this field is empty, a bogus entry is passed to the _PDC
method so that the default (io) access is returned again. This patch
is partly based on David Moore's patch to
arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi.c, sent to the cpufreq mailing list on
June 24th, 2003.

 drivers/acpi/processor.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/acpi/processor.h |    6 ++++++
 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)

diff -ruN linux-original/drivers/acpi/processor.c linux/drivers/acpi/processor.c
--- linux-original/drivers/acpi/processor.c	2004-01-18 19:13:09.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/processor.c	2004-01-28 22:25:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -862,6 +862,33 @@
  * acpi_processor_performance.
  */
 
+static int acpi_processor_set_pdc (struct acpi_processor *pr)
+{
+	acpi_status             status = AE_OK;
+	u32			arg0_buf[3];
+	union acpi_object	arg0 = {ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER};
+	struct acpi_object_list no_object = {1, &arg0};
+	struct acpi_object_list *pdc;
+
+	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_processor_set_pdc");
+	
+	arg0.buffer.length = 12;
+	arg0.buffer.pointer = (u8 *) arg0_buf;
+	arg0_buf[0] = ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID;
+	arg0_buf[1] = 0;
+	arg0_buf[2] = 0;
+
+	pdc = (pr->performance->pdc) ? pr->performance->pdc : &no_object;
+
+	status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_PDC", pdc, NULL);
+
+	if ((ACPI_FAILURE(status)) && (pr->performance->pdc))
+		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Error evaluating _PDC, using legacy perf. control...\n"));
+
+	return_VALUE(status);
+}
+
+
 static int 
 acpi_processor_get_performance_control (
 	struct acpi_processor *pr)
@@ -1029,6 +1056,8 @@
 		return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
 	}
 
+	acpi_processor_set_pdc(pr);
+
 	result = acpi_processor_get_performance_control(pr);
 	if (result)
 		return_VALUE(result);
@@ -1037,6 +1066,10 @@
 	if (result)
 		return_VALUE(result);
 
+	result = acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(pr);
+	if (result)
+		return_VALUE(result);
+
 	return_VALUE(0);
 }
 
diff -ruN linux-original/include/acpi/processor.h linux/include/acpi/processor.h
--- linux-original/include/acpi/processor.h	2004-01-18 19:13:09.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/include/acpi/processor.h	2004-01-19 23:48:44.000000000 +0100
@@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
 	acpi_integer		status;			/* success indicator */
 };
 
+#define ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID                   0x1
+
 struct acpi_processor_performance {
 	unsigned int		 state;
 	unsigned int		 platform_limit;
@@ -74,9 +76,13 @@
 	struct acpi_pct_register status_register;
 	unsigned int		 state_count;
 	struct acpi_processor_px states[ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_PERFORMANCE];
+
+	/* the _PDC objects passed by the driver, if any */
+	struct acpi_object_list *pdc;
 };
 
 
+
 /* Throttling Control */
 
 struct acpi_processor_tx {

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2.6] (4/5) add _PDC support
  2004-01-29 10:59 [PATCH 2.6] (4/5) add _PDC support Dominik Brodowski
@ 2004-01-31  5:46 ` Len Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2004-01-31  5:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dominik Brodowski; +Cc: ACPI Developers, cpufreq

Accepted into ACPI test trees
http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpi-test-2.6.1
http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net/linux-acpi-test-2.6.2

This means it will be pulled into AKPM's 2.6 mm tree on the next update,
and is in the test queue for early 2.6.3.

thanks Dominik,
-Len

On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 05:59, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> Add support for _PDC to the ACPI processor "Performance States library" 
> (perflib). If this field is empty, a bogus entry is passed to the _PDC
> method so that the default (io) access is returned again. This patch
> is partly based on David Moore's patch to
> arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/acpi.c, sent to the cpufreq mailing list on
> June 24th, 2003.
> 
>  drivers/acpi/processor.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/acpi/processor.h |    6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> 
> diff -ruN linux-original/drivers/acpi/processor.c linux/drivers/acpi/processor.c
> --- linux-original/drivers/acpi/processor.c	2004-01-18 19:13:09.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/drivers/acpi/processor.c	2004-01-28 22:25:32.000000000 +0100
> @@ -862,6 +862,33 @@
>   * acpi_processor_performance.
>   */
>  
> +static int acpi_processor_set_pdc (struct acpi_processor *pr)
> +{
> +	acpi_status             status = AE_OK;
> +	u32			arg0_buf[3];
> +	union acpi_object	arg0 = {ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER};
> +	struct acpi_object_list no_object = {1, &arg0};
> +	struct acpi_object_list *pdc;
> +
> +	ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_processor_set_pdc");
> +	
> +	arg0.buffer.length = 12;
> +	arg0.buffer.pointer = (u8 *) arg0_buf;
> +	arg0_buf[0] = ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID;
> +	arg0_buf[1] = 0;
> +	arg0_buf[2] = 0;
> +
> +	pdc = (pr->performance->pdc) ? pr->performance->pdc : &no_object;
> +
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_PDC", pdc, NULL);
> +
> +	if ((ACPI_FAILURE(status)) && (pr->performance->pdc))
> +		ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Error evaluating _PDC, using legacy perf. control...\n"));
> +
> +	return_VALUE(status);
> +}
> +
> +
>  static int 
>  acpi_processor_get_performance_control (
>  	struct acpi_processor *pr)
> @@ -1029,6 +1056,8 @@
>  		return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
>  	}
>  
> +	acpi_processor_set_pdc(pr);
> +
>  	result = acpi_processor_get_performance_control(pr);
>  	if (result)
>  		return_VALUE(result);
> @@ -1037,6 +1066,10 @@
>  	if (result)
>  		return_VALUE(result);
>  
> +	result = acpi_processor_get_platform_limit(pr);
> +	if (result)
> +		return_VALUE(result);
> +
>  	return_VALUE(0);
>  }
>  
> diff -ruN linux-original/include/acpi/processor.h linux/include/acpi/processor.h
> --- linux-original/include/acpi/processor.h	2004-01-18 19:13:09.000000000 +0100
> +++ linux/include/acpi/processor.h	2004-01-19 23:48:44.000000000 +0100
> @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@
>  	acpi_integer		status;			/* success indicator */
>  };
>  
> +#define ACPI_PDC_REVISION_ID                   0x1
> +
>  struct acpi_processor_performance {
>  	unsigned int		 state;
>  	unsigned int		 platform_limit;
> @@ -74,9 +76,13 @@
>  	struct acpi_pct_register status_register;
>  	unsigned int		 state_count;
>  	struct acpi_processor_px states[ACPI_PROCESSOR_MAX_PERFORMANCE];
> +
> +	/* the _PDC objects passed by the driver, if any */
> +	struct acpi_object_list *pdc;
>  };
>  
> 
> +
>  /* Throttling Control */
>  
>  struct acpi_processor_tx {

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-01-31  5:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-01-29 10:59 [PATCH 2.6] (4/5) add _PDC support Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-31  5:46 ` Len Brown

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox