From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: acpi on r40e Date: 09 Feb 2004 23:34:48 -0500 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1076387688.4110.576.camel@dhcppc4> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Praveen C Cc: ACPI Developers List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 11:20, Praveen C wrote: > Another problem with acpi which I forgot to mention is that it makes > the special buttons for volume and brightness control ineffective. If I > boot the same kernel with acpi=off those buttons work fine. Interesting. If you boot, say with "acpi=off", your volume and brightness buttons work, but if you boot with ACPI enabled they have no effect? you DSDT has an IBM defined device: Device (HKEY) { Name (_HID, EisaId ("IBM0068")) which sure sounds like it might be a hot-key device;-) However, not immediately clear to me how ACPI w/o vendor-specific extensions would talk to it. Even more unclear is how and why these buttons work when ACPI is disabled, and how ACPI interferes with their proper operation when it is enabled. -Len ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn