From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] filling in ACPI method access via sysfs namespace Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 22:32:48 -0600 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1081744367.1715.30.camel@debian> References: <407A1787.5060508@myrealbox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <407A1787.5060508-YSGFQ8SKJZVDPfheJLI6IQ@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Matthew Wilcox , John Belmonte , acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2004-04-11 at 22:13, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Is there any reason this shouldn't be an ioctl? > See the thread John pointed me to on Friday: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=7455349 Matthew ended it with "sysfs does not support ioctls. case closed." I'm rather fond of the methods living in the sysfs directory structure... Alex ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click