Re: [PATCH] cleanup ACPI numa warnings

Alex Williamson
2004-08-09T05:10:38Z

On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 21:52 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 21:19, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > Ok, I was all set to switch to static inlines, but it doesn't work.
> > Compiling w/ debug on, _dbg is undefined, which is part of the
> > ACPI_DB_INFO macro, but it only gets setup by the ACPI_FUNCTION_NAME
> > macro. Guess I got lucky by choosing to do it as a macro. IMHO, it
> > doesn't really make sense to make the static inline functions more
> > complicated or hide where they're getting called to make this all work.
> > So, I think the choices are to stick with the ugly macros or put #ifdefs
> > around the code and essentially leave it the way it is. Sorry I didn't
> > give it a more thorough look when originally questioned. Better ideas?
> > Thanks,
>
> That code is already pretty hideous, so perhaps my original question
> doesn't have that much impact. The attached patch at least uses inline
> functions. It still has the #ifdefs, but what else do you expect for
> debugging code? Is this a feasible approach?

If you build with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y, you'll see the problem I was
trying to describe above with this approach.

drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function `acpi_print_srat_processor_affinity':
drivers/acpi/numa.c:44: error: `_dbg' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/acpi/numa.c:44: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/acpi/numa.c:44: error: for each function it appears in.)
drivers/acpi/numa.c: At top level:
drivers/acpi/numa.c:48: error: parse error before '}' token
drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function `acpi_print_srat_memory_affinity':
drivers/acpi/numa.c:52: error: `_dbg' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/acpi/numa.c: At top level:
drivers/acpi/numa.c:58: error: parse error before '}' token
make[2]: *** [drivers/acpi/numa.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/acpi] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2