From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Williamson Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup ACPI numa warnings Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 23:10:38 -0600 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <1092028238.2211.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1091738798.22406.9.camel@tdi> <1091739702.31490.245.camel@nighthawk> <1091741142.22406.28.camel@tdi> <249150000.1091763309@[10.10.2.4]> <20040805205059.3fb67b71.rddunlap@osdl.org> <20040807105729.6adea633.pj@sgi.com> <20040808143631.7c18cae9.rddunlap@osdl.org> <1092025184.2292.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1092027151.6496.13709.camel@nighthawk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1092027151.6496.13709.camel@nighthawk> To: Dave Hansen Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , Paul Jackson , "Martin J. Bligh" , acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 21:52 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 21:19, Alex Williamson wrote: > > Ok, I was all set to switch to static inlines, but it doesn't work. > > Compiling w/ debug on, _dbg is undefined, which is part of the > > ACPI_DB_INFO macro, but it only gets setup by the ACPI_FUNCTION_NAME > > macro. Guess I got lucky by choosing to do it as a macro. IMHO, it > > doesn't really make sense to make the static inline functions more > > complicated or hide where they're getting called to make this all work. > > So, I think the choices are to stick with the ugly macros or put #ifdefs > > around the code and essentially leave it the way it is. Sorry I didn't > > give it a more thorough look when originally questioned. Better ideas? > > Thanks, > > That code is already pretty hideous, so perhaps my original question > doesn't have that much impact. The attached patch at least uses inline > functions. It still has the #ifdefs, but what else do you expect for > debugging code? Is this a feasible approach? If you build with CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y, you'll see the problem I was trying to describe above with this approach. drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function `acpi_print_srat_processor_affinity': drivers/acpi/numa.c:44: error: `_dbg' undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/acpi/numa.c:44: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/acpi/numa.c:44: error: for each function it appears in.) drivers/acpi/numa.c: At top level: drivers/acpi/numa.c:48: error: parse error before '}' token drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function `acpi_print_srat_memory_affinity': drivers/acpi/numa.c:52: error: `_dbg' undeclared (first use in this function) drivers/acpi/numa.c: At top level: drivers/acpi/numa.c:58: error: parse error before '}' token make[2]: *** [drivers/acpi/numa.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [drivers/acpi] Error 2 make: *** [drivers] Error 2