From: Russell Neches <russell-1vnkWVZi4QaVc3sceRu5cw@public.gmane.org>
To: ACPI-Devel
<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Subject: networking half-working after S3 resume
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 21:34:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1092533697.1841.78.camel@localhost> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2259 bytes --]
Hey there!
After an S3 resume, my laptop comes back to life perfectly, with the
exception of networking. I had originally blamed this on the card
drivers until I noticed that my wireless card can still get a link. So,
I tried playing around a bit, and I discovered the following:
* The wireless card correctly detects my AP (SSID, speed, link power, et
cetera)
* I can see DHCP requests coming from the laptop's wired interface, but
the responses from my DHCP server are ignored.
* If I manually configure the wired interface on my laptop and attempt
to ping my desktop, I can see ARP requests coming from the laptop's IP
looking for my desktop.
* If I run "arp -s <desktop_IP> <desktop_ETHER>" on my laptop to
manually create an ARP table entry for my desktop, and then attempt to
ping my desktop, I can see ICMP Echo requests coming from my laptop. My
desktop acknowledges them, but my laptop still gets 100% packet loss.
* dmesg reports transmit timeouts, despite the fact the the packets are,
in fact, reaching my switch:
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
eth0: Transmit timeout, status 0c 0005 c07f media 10.
eth0: Tx queue start entry 4 dirty entry 0.
eth0: Tx descriptor 0 is 0008a03c. (queue head)
eth0: Tx descriptor 1 is 0008a03c.
eth0: Tx descriptor 2 is 0008a03c.
eth0: Tx descriptor 3 is 0008a03c.
eth0: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex, lpa 0x45E1
So, networking is *half* working; I can send packets, I just can't
receive any (the watchdog warnings notwithstanding). It's affecting two
different cards, and persists after removing and reloading modules for
each of them. Both cards seem to retain most basic link layer
functionality. Could this be a bug higher up in the networking stack?
(As opposed to a bug in the drivers.) I've never had an issue with any
kernel networking code above the link layer. Is there a way to prod,
smack or otherwise reload it?
Russell
-- Hardware --
Host: Toshiba Libretto L5
Wired Ethernet: Realtek RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+
Wireless: A MiniPCI thing of some kind (uses orinoco_cs)
-- Software --
Kernel: Plain-vanilla 2.6.7
built with gcc 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-7)
Drivers: 8139too, orinoco_cs, assorted ACPI modules
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2004-08-15 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-15 1:34 Russell Neches [this message]
2004-08-15 4:30 ` networking half-working after S3 resume Cameron Patrick
2004-08-17 9:37 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1092533697.1841.78.camel@localhost \
--to=russell-1vnkwvzi4qavc3sceru5cw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox