From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: CONFIG_ACPI Date: 17 Aug 2004 17:50:42 -0400 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1092779441.25902.21.camel@dhcppc4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: ACPI Developers List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Looking over the ACPI config options, it feels like time for some spring cleaning... In 2.4 it was common to build with CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT but without CONFIG_ACPI to enable HT. Nobody really does that much in 2.6; and actually quite a number of people of complained about how bogus it is. I'd like to make everything with "ACPI" in it depend on CONFIG_ACPI. (except the e820 stuff, which isn't conditionally compiled, even though it is part of ACPI) I think we can also get rid of CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER CONFIG_ACPI_BUS CONFIG_ACPI_EC as they're synonymous with CONFIG_ACPI. I'd like to see the /proc stuff go away, and the CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS should go with it. comments? thanks, ----- CONFIG_ACPI=y CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT=y CONFIG_ACPI_INTERPRETER=y CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP=y CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS=y CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m CONFIG_ACPI_BATTERY=m CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m CONFIG_ACPI_FAN=m CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR=m CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m CONFIG_ACPI_ASUS=m CONFIG_ACPI_TOSHIBA=m CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG=y CONFIG_ACPI_BUS=y CONFIG_ACPI_EC=y CONFIG_ACPI_POWER=y CONFIG_ACPI_PCI=y CONFIG_ACPI_SYSTEM=y ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285