From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [Ipw2100-devel] Re: ibm-acpi-0.3 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 21:21:27 +0100 Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Message-ID: <1092860488.7866.12.camel@tyrosine> References: <20040810080826.GD28939@aero.ensim.com> <20040814211247.GS20883@aero.ensim.com> <20040817091921.GI20883@aero.ensim.com> <1092807746.25902.155.camel@dhcppc4> <4123755C.1010503@linux.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4123755C.1010503-b5Z7lJ3WibVrdx17CPfAsdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: James Ketrenos Cc: Len Brown , Borislav Deianov , ACPI Developers , linux-thinkpad-l7BEYHA5S10i5T99jlK1Sh2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org, ipw2100-devel List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 10:27 -0500, James Ketrenos wrote: > As of 0.53 (since the proc entries are all broken in 0.52) the script > could be changed to do something more along these lines (until we change > from proc to sysfs and from strings to ints): Surely going to /sys/bus/pci/devices/whatever/power/state is more useful? In the long run that'll probably also power down the device, which seems to save me a few hundred mW over just removing the module. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285