From: Len Brown <len.brown-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Jos Delbar <jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org>
Cc: ACPI Developers
<acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
Robert Moore
<robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Linux ACPI processor driver patch: user-definable power state limit
Date: 09 Oct 2004 01:52:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1097301120.16784.2.camel@d845pe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408071959.10529.jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3359 bytes --]
Jos,
Can you modify this patch to use a kernel boot parameter
rather than a module load parameter? Some folks don't
load this driver as a module. Also, it gives you the
chance to add a couple of lines to Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
thanks,
-Len
On Sat, 2004-08-07 at 13:59, Jos Delbar wrote:
> On Monday 02 August 2004 02:54, you wrote:
> > I think we need a patch like this for a number of reasons.
> > Some systems experience data corruption with C3,
> > so until it is fixed we need an easy way to disable C3.
> >
> > boot parameter names must begin with acpi though.
> > maybe acpi_cstate_limit=3 or something?
> >
> > Please send me the exact model numbers of the Dells
> > that you know have this problem. I met a guy from
> > Dell who I may be able to get to help us with
> > those models.
> >
> > thanks,
> > -Len
>
> I browsed through the Dell community forums and I believe it is safe
> to
> conclude that at least the following notebook models may have this
> problem:
>
> - Inspiron 300m, 500m, 600m
> - Inspiron 4000, 4100, 4150
> - Inspiron 8100, 8200, 8500, 8600
> - Latitude C840
> - Latitude D500, D600, D800
>
> As expected, all of these systems use a mobile processor chipset, with
> either
> an Intel Celeron-M, Pentium III-M, Pentium 4-M or Pentium M processor.
> All of
> the people who have posted about this buzzing noise are using an
> ACPI-enabled
> operating system, the majority Windows 2000/XP. Windows 98 does not
> have this
> problem, for example. On systems that support it, disabling the power
> management of the USB Root Hub(s) apparently softens--but does not
> eliminate--the buzzing.
>
> I updated the patch with the new module parameter name
> "acpi_cstate_limit" and
> cleaned up the results of /proc/acpi/processor/.../power a little. The
> output
> using acpi_cstate_limit=2 will now resemble:
>
> active state: C2
> default state: C1
> user limit: C2
> bus master activity: ffffffff
> states:
> C1: promotion[C2] demotion[--] latency[000] usage[00300510]
> *C2: promotion[--] demotion[C1] latency[050] usage[04964774]
> C3: <disabled>
>
> If acpi_cstate_limit is passed as a kernel boot parameter, the kernel
> ring
> buffer will reflect this. For example, using
> "processor.acpi_cstate_limit=1",
> the relevant output for my system is:
>
> ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports C0 C1, 8 throttling states)
>
> I chose to always display C0 so this message will still make sense
> when using
> acpi_cstate_limit=0.
>
> One of the changes that I made, is unrelated to the C state limit.
>
> @@ -2417,7 +2446,7 @@
> pr = (struct acpi_processor *) acpi_driver_data(device);
>
> /* Unregister the idle handler when processor #0 is removed.
> */
> - if (pr->id == 0)
> + if ((pr->id == 0) && (pr->flags.power))
> pm_idle = pm_idle_save;
>
> status = acpi_remove_notify_handler(pr->handle,
> ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
>
> Without the check for pr->flags.power, it's possible that the old idle
> handler
> would be "restored" without ever being stored in the function
> acpi_processor_add(). In practice this shouldn't cause a problem since
> the
> pm_idle_save global variable is implicitly initialized to NULL, but it
> feels
> safer to do the check anyway.
>
> Regards,
>
> - Jos Delbar
> jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org
>
[-- Attachment #2: processor.c.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4384 bytes --]
--- /usr/src/linux/drivers/acpi/processor.c 2004-08-07 18:25:15.064497551 +0200
+++ processor.c 2004-08-07 18:31:24.013809421 +0200
@@ -30,6 +30,14 @@
* 4. Need C1 timing -- must modify kernel (IRQ handler) to get this.
*/
+/*
+ * 07/08/04; Jos Delbar <jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org>:
+ * Recognize power state limit as a boot parameter.
+ *
+ * 31/07/04; Jos Delbar <jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org>:
+ * Add user-definable processor power state limit.
+ */
+
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
@@ -80,6 +88,16 @@
MODULE_DESCRIPTION(ACPI_PROCESSOR_DRIVER_NAME);
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+/*
+ * The acpi_cstate_limit module parameter represents the maximum processor power state or
+ * C state to promote to. Values of 1, 2 and 3 are equivalent to the C1, C2 and C3 sleep
+ * states, respectively. A value of 0 disables processor power management altogether.
+ */
+
+static int acpi_cstate_limit = ACPI_C_STATES_MAX;
+
+module_param(acpi_cstate_limit, int, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(acpi_cstate_limit, "Limit the processor power state (0 = disable power management)");
static int acpi_processor_add (struct acpi_device *device);
static int acpi_processor_remove (struct acpi_device *device, int type);
@@ -449,6 +467,7 @@
sleep_ticks = ticks_elapsed(t1, t2) - cx->latency_ticks - C3_OVERHEAD;
break;
+ case ACPI_STATE_C0:
default:
local_irq_enable();
return;
@@ -535,7 +554,7 @@
* C0/C1
* -----
*/
- pr->power.state = ACPI_STATE_C1;
+ pr->power.state = (acpi_cstate_limit != ACPI_STATE_C0 ? ACPI_STATE_C1 : ACPI_STATE_C0);
pr->power.default_state = ACPI_STATE_C1;
/*
@@ -554,7 +573,7 @@
* TBD: Demote to default C-State after long periods of activity.
* TBD: Investigate policy's use of CPU utilization -vs- sleep duration.
*/
- if (pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C2].valid) {
+ if (pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C2].valid && (acpi_cstate_limit >= ACPI_STATE_C2)) {
pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C1].promotion.threshold.count = 10;
pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C1].promotion.threshold.ticks =
pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C2].latency_ticks;
@@ -575,7 +594,7 @@
* short or whenever bus mastering activity occurs.
*/
if ((pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C2].valid) &&
- (pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C3].valid)) {
+ (pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C3].valid) && (acpi_cstate_limit >= ACPI_STATE_C3)) {
pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C2].promotion.threshold.count = 4;
pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C2].promotion.threshold.ticks =
pr->power.states[ACPI_STATE_C3].latency_ticks;
@@ -1859,10 +1878,15 @@
goto end;
seq_printf(seq, "active state: C%d\n"
- "default state: C%d\n"
- "bus master activity: %08x\n",
+ "default state: C%d\n",
pr->power.state,
- pr->power.default_state,
+ pr->power.default_state);
+
+ if (acpi_cstate_limit < ACPI_C_STATES_MAX) seq_printf(seq,
+ "user limit: C%d\n",
+ acpi_cstate_limit);
+
+ seq_printf(seq, "bus master activity: %08x\n",
pr->power.bm_activity);
seq_puts(seq, "states:\n");
@@ -1876,6 +1900,11 @@
continue;
}
+ if (i > acpi_cstate_limit) {
+ seq_puts(seq, "<disabled>\n");
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (pr->power.states[i].promotion.state)
seq_printf(seq, "promotion[C%d] ",
pr->power.states[i].promotion.state);
@@ -2384,7 +2413,7 @@
printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "%s [%s] (supports",
acpi_device_name(device), acpi_device_bid(device));
- for (i=1; i<ACPI_C_STATE_COUNT; i++)
+ for (i=0; i<=acpi_cstate_limit; i++)
if (pr->power.states[i].valid)
printk(" C%d", i);
if (pr->flags.throttling)
@@ -2417,7 +2446,7 @@
pr = (struct acpi_processor *) acpi_driver_data(device);
/* Unregister the idle handler when processor #0 is removed. */
- if (pr->id == 0)
+ if ((pr->id == 0) && (pr->flags.power))
pm_idle = pm_idle_save;
status = acpi_remove_notify_handler(pr->handle, ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
@@ -2447,6 +2476,10 @@
memset(&processors, 0, sizeof(processors));
memset(&errata, 0, sizeof(errata));
+ /* Check for illegal user limits. */
+ if(acpi_cstate_limit < ACPI_STATE_C0 || acpi_cstate_limit > ACPI_C_STATES_MAX)
+ return_VALUE(-EINVAL);
+
acpi_processor_dir = proc_mkdir(ACPI_PROCESSOR_CLASS, acpi_root_dir);
if (!acpi_processor_dir)
return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
next parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-09 5:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200408071959.10529.jos.delbar@ugent.be>
[not found] ` <200408071959.10529.jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org>
2004-10-09 5:52 ` Len Brown [this message]
2004-10-09 18:56 ` Re: Linux ACPI processor driver patch: user-definable power state limit Dominik Brodowski
2004-10-10 14:36 ` Jos Delbar
2004-10-10 16:56 Brown, Len
[not found] ` <F7DC2337C7631D4386A2DF6E8FB22B3001A193B6-N2PTB0HCzHKkrb+BlOpmy7fspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
2004-10-11 21:35 ` Jos Delbar
[not found] ` <200410112335.19159.jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org>
2004-10-19 17:19 ` Len Brown
2004-11-05 19:45 ` Len Brown
2004-11-05 22:58 ` Len Brown
2004-11-05 23:21 ` Jos Delbar
[not found] ` <200411060021.49794.jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org>
2004-11-06 1:01 ` Len Brown
2004-11-06 2:59 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1097301120.16784.2.camel@d845pe \
--to=len.brown-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jos.delbar-Cru1EgDzd7c@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robert.moore-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox