From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Lintner Subject: S3 vs suspend-to-disk Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 10:40:33 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1104658833.41d7c191cb816@webmail.telering.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi, what do you think is better concerning the protection and lifetime of the hardware: S1/S3 or suspend-to-disk if you need the PC about 6 times a day (<1 hour) and set it to standby/suspend in the meantime? Thanks :-) Stefan ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt