From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: acpi_sbs with kernel 2.6.11 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:49:36 +0000 Message-ID: <1110502177.8136.6.camel@tyrosine> References: <75eeb70e0503092013562a05d@mail.gmail.com> <75eeb70e05030921185b337dd2@mail.gmail.com> <4230A2BD.6090609@bartol.udel.edu> <1110500644.8136.1.camel@tyrosine> <4230E9E9.2010600@bartol.udel.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <4230E9E9.2010600-OBnUx95tOyn10jlvfTC4gA@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2005-03-10 at 19:44 -0500, Rich Townsend wrote: > So I should instead be looking to implementing the SBS stuff in the HAL? > Sounds good to me. Where's the main site for the HAL work? http://hal.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software_2fhal is the main site - you want the CVS code, I believe. The mailing list archives ought to have more information on the current code. Gnome will certainly be moving to using hal for battery status in the next release - I believe that KDE will be moving in that direction post 3.4 as well. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click