From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Adam Belay Subject: Re: [PATCH] PNPACPI: don't complain about vendor-defined resources Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:07:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1110586059.12485.225.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1108160048.31877.75.camel@eeyore> <1110344980.9332.0.camel@d845pe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <1110344980.9332.0.camel@d845pe> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Len Brown Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , ACPI Developers , Shaohua Li List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2005-03-09 at 00:09 -0500, Len Brown wrote: > Applied. > > thanks, > -Len Just out of curiosity, are we seeing many vendor-defined resources from ACPI? Thanks, Adam ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click