From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: HP/Compaq NC6120 ACPI problems Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 03:19:34 +0000 Message-ID: <1111202374.8136.210.camel@tyrosine> References: <20050317200052.686d683f.andrej.prsa@guest.arnes.si> <1111088904.11380.36.camel@eeyore> <20050317215635.1c788c09.andrej.prsa@guest.arnes.si> <1111104319.8136.182.camel@tyrosine> <20050318192300.629e2148.andrej.prsa@guest.arnes.si> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050318192300.629e2148.andrej.prsa-zs/Xt9NzJtxxh+DGd0HQrg@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: acpi-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 19:23 +0100, Andrej Prsa wrote: > Tried it, unfortunately the outcome is still the same; I used the patch > against 2.6.11.4 kernel *without* any other ACPI patch. Should I use the > patch you provided over the ACPI patch or was it supposed to fix the fan > issue by itself? Seemingly the problem is the fan; is there a way to > test this to be sure? Hmm. Yes, I can now repeat this with a 6220, though most of the time I manage it it seems to be linked to a suspend to disk beforehand. I suspect this /may/ be linked to the fact that on the 6120, only the first lid event is received. I'll see if I can track this down over the weekend. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59-1xO5oi07KQx4cg9Nei1l7Q@public.gmane.org ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click