From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 Date: 25 Mar 2005 21:24:21 -0500 Message-ID: <1111803861.19920.91.camel@d845pe> References: <20050325002154.335c6b0b.akpm@osdl.org> <20050326014327.GB207782@dragonfly.engr.sgi.com> <1111802218.19916.59.camel@d845pe> <20050326020212.GC207782@dragonfly.engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20050326020212.GC207782-MxuHJOjpcnauM61iycY1Zzbuus4N2nEH@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Jason Uhlenkott Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ACPI Developers List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 21:02, Jason Uhlenkott wrote: > On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 08:56:58PM -0500, Len Brown wrote: > > Please send me the .config you'd like to build. > > arch/ia64/configs/sn2_defconfig > > I believe that what we want to do is include CONFIG_PM. > > At first glance, it looks like that will enable suspend/resume > functionality (which I don't think we want on SGI sn2) for a bunch of > drivers. What bad things happen if you define CONFIG_PM on SN2? Re: CONFIG_ACPI_BOOT I've got a patch that makes it go away -- this looks like a good reason for me to dust it off... Looks like arch/ia64/Kconfig defines ACPI and then pulls in drivers/acpi/Kconfig, which it should not do - it should look like i386/Kconfig... -Len ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click