From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Date: 08 Apr 2005 23:20:34 -0400 Message-ID: <1113016833.2418.14.camel@d845pe> References: <20050408092947.41175d63.akpm@osdl.org> <425707A2.2050208@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <425707A2.2050208-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Michael Thonke Cc: Andrew Morton , ACPI Developers , Bjorn Helgaas List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 18:37, Michael Thonke wrote: > Hi Andrew and Bjorn, > > but whats so different that causes some PCI-E cards to get not > regonized > or working at all? > I mean 2.6.11.x works and 2.6.12-rc2 works,while 2.6.12-rc1 was like > mm-behavior with > > ACPI: Can't get handler for > Not possible, the code that prints that (nop) string is not present in Linus' tree -- it exists only in the mm patch. Indeed, the glue.c code that prints this message has been in mm tree, and you can remove just that patch by getting it here: http://linux-acpi.bkbits.net:8080/to-akpm/cset@423bb5a2CcvybiQpT6qaZpTIzPtzCQ If 2.6.12-rc1 was broken like the mm tree, then it could have had noting to do with this. -Len ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click