From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bjorn Helgaas Subject: Re: Fw: Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm2 Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:17:13 -0600 Message-ID: <1113322633.17684.23.camel@eeyore> References: <16A54BF5D6E14E4D916CE26C9AD30575019C29C7@pdsmsx402.ccr.corp.intel.com> <425AA4C1.6050609@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <425AA4C1.6050609-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: acpi-devel-admin-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Michael Thonke Cc: "Li, Shaohua" , "Nguyen, Tom L" , Len Brown , ACPI List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 18:24 +0200, Michael Thonke wrote: > It first consider that no bus supports ACPI, but than it say ACPI supported. > Maybe I interpret it in the wrong way. I hope you will/can fnd what is > wrong. > ... > This message 1st spotted over the screen: > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:00 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:01 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:02 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:03 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:04 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:05 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:06 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:07 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:08 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:09 > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:0a > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for 00:0b > > And then for each pcie port: > ACPI: No ACPI bus support for pcie00-03 The messages above are harmless, so you can ignore them. ACPI is in fact supported and working in spite of these messages. > After that this appears: > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 201 > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:02:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 201 > ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:00:1f.1[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 217 These messages are perfectly normal. Apart from the messages, what is actually broken? Is there a device that is not functional? Which one? ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click