From: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
To: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ACPI] [RFC/PATCH 3/3] ACPI based I/O APIC hot-plug
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 08:58:01 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1114181881.4902.4.camel@eeyore> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42689BEB.90401@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 15:38 +0900, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> >>+ if ((dev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_SYSTEM_PIC)
> >>+ continue;
> >>+ if ((dev->class & 0xff) == 0x10 || (dev->class & 0xff) == 0x20)
> >
> >
> > What are 0x10 and 0x20? Looks like they should be #defines in
> > include/linux/pci_ids.h.
>
> 0x10 and 0x20 are programing interfaces for I/O APIC and I/O xAPIC
> respectively. #define for these values looks good. But I don't know
> if I can put new #defines into pci_ids.h and how to name them because
> I could not find the header file (including pci_ids.h) that #defines
> the values for programming interfaces. So I want to add the comments
> to explain these values (0x10, 0x20) instead of adding new #defines into
> pci_ids.h for now.
I think your patch should just add the values to pci_ids.h. If
somebody doesn't like that, he or she will complain and you can fall
back to just using 0x10 and 0x20. But I suspect it will be fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-22 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-21 13:39 [RFC/PATCH 3/3] ACPI based I/O APIC hot-plug Kenji Kaneshige
2005-04-21 17:22 ` [ACPI] " Bjorn Helgaas
2005-04-22 6:38 ` Kenji Kaneshige
2005-04-22 14:58 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2005-04-22 15:15 ` Greg KH
2005-04-25 9:16 ` [ACPI] " Kenji Kaneshige
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1114181881.4902.4.camel@eeyore \
--to=bjorn.helgaas@hp.com \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox